Showing posts with label review. Show all posts
Showing posts with label review. Show all posts

Tuesday, 28 July 2015

The Low Carb Body

I have been thinking of how to write something that is interesting but also to some extent unique about the low carbohydrate / ketosis diet. How can I help to convince people that this is something which it might be worth them trying and trying so knowing that their health is not going to be negatively impacted. I decided to fall back onto my old science roots and look into what I can find there to try and help people see the benefits of this lifestyle. This will no doubt bore many people however there are so many sites out there with meals and stories (don’t get me wrong we are not going to stop that) but this is something which I might be able to do a good job of.

So I am hoping that I will keep this up and do a series of posts on the low carbohydrate body. I was unsure where to start as there are links to so many different areas of the body, the brain, the heart, (belly) fat, kidneys,  lungs and even links to acne so the skin. Luckily for me there is already a fantastic review which I am hoping to summarise in basic terms and then go into each body part in detail. Not sure how long this will take but hopefully it will go some-way to showing to showing sceptics that there is a huge amount of science showing that there are health benefits to this lifestyle.

Weight loss:
Firstly you have weight loss. Although there is no doubt it works (e.g. over 11 stone between Katie and I in 7 months) there are different thoughts as to how it works. Some people suggest that you simply lose weight because you are on a “diet” so you eat less calories and so of course you lose weight. Of course the other train of thought is that it is a metabolic process, so in other words you are altering the way that your body is using energy and storing fat and this causes the weight loss. Studies are available to support both arguments, for example it has been shown that in a 6 month study people on a low-carb diet lost more weight than those on a “balanced diet” where around equal amounts of calories were consumed. The authors believe that a more likely solution is the well proven appetite suppressant impact of a LCKD. Another important factor for weight loss is that it will more likely be fat being burnt as a LCKD results in a reduction in fat intake and an increase in fat breakdown. I have seen people question the appetite reduction however both Katie and I can confirm this and I will add that to my list of more in-depth posts to do.

Heart:
The biggest area of concern when people hear what you are eating is that you are going to have a negative impact on your heart. However recent studies have shown that actually a LCKD is probably going to improve your cholesterol levels and lipid profile (lipid = fats). In fact there is a role for insulin (obviously lowered in LCKD diets) in the production of cholesterol, so by lowering your sugar and therefore insulin you are likely to lower the production of cholesterol. Therefore the idea that a high fats are bad for you is not necessarily true when you are in ketosis.

Pancreas (Diabetes):
As most people probably know sugar causes you to have increased levels of insulin which causes your cells to take up more sugar. Over time, if you continue to eat too much sugar, your cells become less responsive to insulin so your body just keeps on pumping out more and more insulin. From what I can remember from my first year at university that is very basically the cause for diabetes. In someone with diabetes they are likely to take up less carbohydrates into cells for use as an energy source because their body is not responding to the insulin, this then means that it will head over to the liver and be converted into fat. When carbs are restricted to the point where this increased fat production does not occur then the symptoms of being insulin resistance with normally improve and frequently disappear. In a nutshell lowering carb intake in insulin sensitive individuals can result in a positive clinical outcome.

I think here it is best to quote the review I am reviewing…

“In studies that have evaluated well-formulated very-low-carbohydrate diets and documented high rates of compliance in individuals with T2D, results have been nothing short of remarkable. Bistrian et al.32reported withdrawal of insulin and major weight loss in a matter of weeks in T2D individuals who were fed a very-low-calorie and -carbohydrate diet. “

A similar study has been done over the course of more than a year and patients showed improvements in weight, glucose levels, cholesterol and triglyceride levels. Note that these same improvements are beyond what is seen in individuals on a low fat diet.

Brain:
Well I say brain but initially at least I am looking at epilepsy, you could also put reduced hunger under the brain to some extent. For treatment of epilepsy there have actually been clinical trials to show that a low carbohydrate diet can be used as a treatment. The full method of action is yet to be elucidated there is a clear end result and for those more interested it is perhaps best to read the papers link to in the article.

For the brain I would also recommend reading grain brain, on this diet we eat significantly less grain and there have been links to the benefits of this on memory and even delaying the impact of dementia. This is further mentioned in this review, where they mention there is emerging evidence that ketogenic diets may have a positive impact on Alzheimer’s and Parkinson’s disease as well as autism , sleep disorders and multiple sclerosis. Overall it suggests that a ketogenic diet could be neuro-protective. Although this generic protection may sound strange I heard of a similar impact in different pathways in the brain. The key here is that certain pathways can be impacted from several different angles and have an impact on different places. A LCKD is thought to have an impact on multiple pathways in the brain and protect against the above conditions. I will not go into detail on the conditions but overall there is not sufficient evidence to say that it does work but there is on-going work that shows promise.

The bad side: Some people quote higher protein intake as a bad thing, I would argue that I am not eating more fat or protein compared to not being on this lifestyle, I am simply eating fewer carbohydrates. There is the idea that of ketoacidosis which is high level of ketones causing the blood to become acidic. This is highly unlikely to occur if you have normal insulin levels and if your ketone levels stay in the normal range expected on the diet.

Cancer / tumours:

I think I have mentioned this before and to be this is important. Many cancers run on glucose and have reduced growth and development without it being present. Note that I am not saying that a low-carbohydrate diet is going to cure cancer rather that is might help to slow the progress of some cancers. This may also be applicable to other non-cancerous conditions. I suffer from plantar fibromatosis / Ledderhose disease. I have had radiotherapy and all being well the condition is not too bad however the residual pain I was suffering from has decreased to the point I almost forget about it since starting on a LCKD. There are various papers that support this hypothesis but only time will tell how useful it can be.

Conclusion:

I could go on as there are many studies I have not looked at and some conditions like acne that I have ignored.

Don’t get me wrong some of the above is not completely proven. The thing that most annoys me about telling people I am on this life-style is the perception that it is unhealthy, if these people would just listen and do their research then perhaps they would no longer challenge us and perhaps question the suspect guidelines given out by governments which are coming under more and more scrutiny all the time. When Katie and I started this diet it was just that, it was a diet. The more I have read and the more I have learnt the more it has become a life-style and the less I have wanted to eat carbs. Knowing all this puts me off of going back onto a higher level of carbs, certainly I have no issue with not eating bread, potatoes, crisps, pasta etc. and I am even starting to be less jealous of those eating Katie’s awesome cakes but for most things we have workarounds that taste good.

Tuesday, 9 June 2015

Runner Academy Podcast:

Not exactly low carb but related to the exercise that we have been doing. I also intend to start looking into some low-carb podcasts that I have heard about. For busy people this is a great way to absorb more information. 
One of the areas of sport that I think often gets neglected is knowledge, knowledge is power after all. I a sponge and an addict when it comes to information collecting, I did it for my degree and I did it when my foot got bad and badminton coaching and now I starting to do it for running.
The problem with running compared to the other subjects above is the sheer volume of information and trying to work out what is useful. I enjoy reading but there is a limited pool of readable running books that I have access to and so I thought I would see what else is out there. Running videos don’t seem to exist but I then found out there appeared to be a load of podcasts. These are great for me to listen to on my commute.
I started with the Runners Academy Podcast and that is what I am going to “review” today. I have listened to quite a few of these podcasts and have been very impressed with the content and the quality of the people being interviewed.
I have listed to other podcasts and it really depends on what you are listening for, if it is to get some great information and listen to some great guests then this is a top podcast. It is one of the first places I came across a lot of the running methods that I now use and have learnt more about things like 80:20 running from this podcast. In fact in my opinion you could just listen to this and not buy the book (the book is good but unless you want the plans not worth the extra money once you know the principles). I have heard from elite runners, ultra-marathon runners and various doctors and all have had interesting things to say.
The podcasts always features a running tip of the week and they go into reasonable detail to explain different aspects such as nutrition etc on the ones that I have listened to. There is also the quote of the week, these are short and sweet and normally not that helpful.
Overall I feel that the podcasts have been very valuable to my running experience and enabled me to absorb a lot of information that I would otherwise not have come across or bothered with. It is easy to listen to on the commute and you can easily go back and listen to the most useful ones again. I have listened to the 80:20 running podcast at least twice. My only negative is that I feel it could do with 2 hosts, 1 host can come a bit monotonous and in others I have listened to there is great banter and differences in knowledge and experience when 2 hosts are used.
Fantastic Podcast and well worth listening to…
9/10

Tuesday, 26 May 2015

My Review of 80:20 Running

80/20 Running: Run Stronger and Race Faster By Training Slower by Matt Fitzgerald 


The basic idea behind this book is fairly simple, in order to run faster in a race you need to run slower in training. As odd as this may seem this is exactly what the professionals have been doing for years and it is thought to be the best training method for beginners and elite alike. 

The book takes you through some of the science and rationale behind running this way and then gives you some different plans and different types of session that you should do. I don't want to go into too much detail but these principles have been tested not only in running but many other sports. 

The book itself is mostly well written but the plans did not come out well on the Kindle edition, nevertheless the actual body of the text was useful. 

The problem that I have with this book is that it is basically a basic principle, run 80% of your training at a very slow pace, run 20% at a moderate or ideally high intensity and the book is really evidence to try and convince you that this is what you should be doing. Who is going to read this book though, well only people that are really getting into their running like me and even then most of them probably won't read it. So it is left to coaches who probably already know what to do. 

Where this book does redeem itself is in the principle, the principle of 80 / 20 works or at least that is my belief after only a few weeks. 

Me and Running and 80/20:

After reading an on-line article I shifted to this principle of training and thought it might work for me, I want to increase my mileage but knew I was going to get injured, the key it seems was to slow down. Having now slowed down in most of my training my legs are feeling fresh and my body is recovering quicker than ever and I can run 5 times a week, previously I struggled with 3 (hill, interval and ok pace long run). 

I was sceptical about how this might impact my speed but having put in 2 miles at the end of my last 10km at only 30 second off my 1 mile PB I am optimistic that I will smash my 5k PB this weekend. Best of all is that as I am running slowly I don't feel any niggles and if I do I adjust slightly and feel fine, before my knees and ankles would be clicking and aching but it is no longer a problem. 

Rating: 2.5 / 5

Overall it is a good book and it is based on a solid premise, however I do not think that there was really enough here to make a book. A couple of on-line articles and a pod-cast (like the author has done for Runner Academy) are enough to get you going with this principle.